Death, Dying and Dessert


I was in the midst of talking with my mom about hospice for her sister when I came across Susan Lieberman on the web.  Because I'm suffering from summer brain, I can't remember how I found her.  I get emails and notifications all the time when something is death related. I guess it doesn't matter, but I'm so glad I found her book, "Death, Dying and Dessert: Reflections on 20 Questions about Dying."  I have a TON of books on death, but I found her book to be a very helpful guide for those who are just starting to think about it and what things they should be getting in order.  I think it would be a great gift book.

And here she is!  Like me, she's lived in a lot of other places before settling in the Lone Star State.



So, let's get started...

DW:  What made you want to write a book about death?


Susan Lieberman:  When my 92-year-old mother slid from independence into decline and ultimately death, I realized how little I knew about illness and all the decisions that come in a healthcare crisis. And I also realized that when she died, I would be next up. I didn’t want my children to face the same anxiety and stress, the chaos, both internal and external, that I experienced. So I began to study death and dying.

As part of the learning process, I asked some women friends if they wanted to come to dinner one night to talk about death and dying. As you can imagine, I didn’t get many takers but five of us sat down together. That was over three years ago. Now there are 20 women in the group. Every eight weeks or so we take on a different topic related to death, dying and aging, triggered by a conversation question.

I suppose it sounds odd to say we have loved talking about dying, but it has been a really positive experience for all of us. We have all become less anxious, better informed, less afraid. I wanted to bring our dinner conversations to those who couldn’t show up at the table.

I’m a writer. I’ve done seven other books so writing a book isn’t unusual for me. I seem to write the books I need to read. Writing is my own kind of therapy; it helps me find clarity. Many of my books addressed earlier developmental stages. This seems to be where I am headed next so it made sense to want to think about it.

DW:  What was the most challenging aspect of writing this book?

Susan Lieberman:  The hardest part was getting started. I began thinking seriously about this book a year before anything worthwhile appeared on the computer. Three times I sat down to begin…and nothing happened. It just didn’t come in any way that felt authentic. Then, in October of 2012, I sat down again and it just appeared. By December, I had a complete draft. The book went to the layout person the end of March.

What makes a good book a better book is the editing of what you already have. I wanted so much for this book to be easily readable and to give lots of value to anyone who bought it. Making sure I did my best to deliver on that by editing the draft was a challenge. I worked at it intensely.

DW:  As you say in your book, most people believe they will die; they just don't expect it to happen in their lifetime. Why do you think that is?

Susan Lieberman:  We come factory-ready to focus on living. Although we are dying from the moment we are born, it’s not, of course, where our attention goes. To think about leaving this delicious world is not attractive to most of us.

Our ego wants to be in control, and there is no controlling death, but by imaging we are going beat it, we feel we have some control. Second, our culture hides death. We tuck it away most often in hospitals and when we have to watch that, it can be painful to see. It scares us. Denial is a sensible strategy to escape thinking about our own demise. Doesn’t it sometimes seem that we regard aging and dying as failures. Look at the language in obituaries...”she battled courageously…he fought a long and valiant fight..” It’s the language of war and in war, there are winners and losers so when we die, we are losers. But you don’t wage war against yourself. Death is another stage of development that each of us comes to in our own time. We don’t yet talk about it that way.

So many people have told me that dying scares them. Who wants to be scared? But if we can figure out what we scared of and what we can do to make it easier, then maybe we can find our way to think about, talk about and prepare for the inevitable.

DW:  On your website, it says you are an "end of life consultant." What does that involve?

Susan Lieberman:  I talk with healthy people about end-of-life issues. Sometimes I meet with individuals who are not healthy or those whose loved ones are facing death, but mainly I talk with groups of people who are in the fullness of life. My first interest is in getting people to think about dying, just for a little bit, while it is abstract and less personal and to understand what they need to do to make things easier when it gets very personal.

I am certified by the Association of Death Education and Counseling as a thanatologist. I joke that this means I have a skull and crossbones tattooed on my left thigh.

DW:  You discuss having a "death, dying and dessert" group. Is your group open to the public, or do you keep it going with the same group of people?

Susan Lieberman:  My Death, Dying and Dessert group grows out of larger women’s group, and all its members come from that group. We were all women over 50 moving from our mainstream lives to What’s Next. When new women join the larger group, they are welcome to join in our conversations, but no, it’s not open to the public generally.

Just this week, the New York Times had a front page article about Death Cafes springing up around the country. These are open groups that meet generally in coffee shops to talk about the same sorts of things we have been discussing. I’ve included the questions we have used over the years in Appendix I of the book, and any group could form and use or adapt our list.

DW:  What has been the topic that has caused the greatest debate within your group?

Susan Lieberman:  Pamela, I don’t have an answer for this question. I cannot think of any topic, even euthanasia, that provoked great debate. One of the things that makes this group work so well is that nobody feels compelled to convince others of her opinions. The conversation just puts things out there, and people take home what they want. Of course, we see things differently, and there is no “rule” about disagreeing. I’m not sure why it doesn’t cause debate, but it doesn’t. Yes, sometimes people will say, “Gee, that’s not my experience,” or “I never thought of it in those terms,” but I don’t think one person in the group believe there is a single set of right answers that everyone should adopt. Our focus is figuring out what each of us thinks is right for her.

Maybe the topic that we have struggled with the most has to do with how we will be able to ask for and receive help if and when we need it. We have talked about the loss of independence. This seems to provoke more fear than dying.

Oddly, one of the least good conversations we had was about the role of God in our thinking about death and dying. People were very candid about what they thought, but it didn’t generate any sparked conversation. I think each one of us wanted so much to be respectful of other’s views that there was more listening than talking.



Where's the FUN?

On Father's Day, I took my husband to see Man of Steel, as it seemed like a safe bet for both adults, a kid and a tween to go see and enjoy.  I like Superman, but I'm not like an aficionado or anything.  I don't read comic books and I never watched Lois & Clark or Smallville.  I didn't even see the last movie with Brandon Routh.  I just saw the films with Christopher Reeves when I was a kid and I remember them fondly.  


Now, $50 later, I feel sort of let down by Man of Steel and I keep wondering why. It could be that it was really violent.  There is a huge amount of destruction and Superman plays a part in the wreckage.  I'm sure people die in the film from all the buildings collapsing, but we're never shown it.  We're just shown a very angry Superman taking out all his repressed aggression on General Zod and his female companion, Faora, who brags "You have a sense of morality and we do not. And that gives us an evolutionary advantage.  And if there's one thing that history teaches us it's that evolution always wins." Well, we know that when someone makes a statement like that, they're going down.  Call me old fashioned or something, but I just wish that Superman would have struggled a bit with hitting a woman, even if she was evil. I needed to see his humanity and it just wasn't there.

I could also blame the lack of  FUN for not really liking this film.  I think why I like the Spider Man franchise with Toby McGuire is because we get to watch his transformation into Spider Man and he LOVES it.  He is amazed at his strength and ability and he gets how cool it is.  He also knows the responsibility that comes with that power and therein lies the tension of the film.  He wants to get the girl, but he knows if that happens, he puts her in grave danger.  Superman in his latest reincarnation just didn't have any fun.  I would have loved to see him as a kid doing something super, "Look Ma, no hands!"and having his parents totally freak out.  But, no. Instead, we see him freak out in class and his mom consoles him. Much later, we got to see him fly around really fast and kind of dig that, but it was a little too late.  Who wants a moody, sad Superman?  Not me.  


So, who is your favorite superhero?  Why?  Did you see Man of Steel?  Thumbs up?  Down?

True Crime Writer, Suzy Spencer

Happy Tuesday, folks!  Today I am pleased to have Suzy Spencer on the blog.  I met 

Suzy Spencer

 when she was a featured speaker at the

DFW Writers' Conference

a few months ago.  It was a Sunday morning and she was talking about SEX!  So, you know me, I was curious.  But, that's not why I've invited her on the Death Writer Blog.  Although her latest book is a memoir about investigating the fringes of American sexuality, she began as a true crime writer.

And here she is!

DW:  Initially, what made you interested in writing about true crime?

Suzy Spencer:  I fell into writing true crime. In 1996 a writer/friend came to me and said there’s a really interesting murder that YOU have to write about. When I asked her – and kept asking her – why I had to write about it and why she shouldn’t write it, she never answered. She just kept repeating YOU have to write it.

I did a bit of research on the murder. It was interesting – a rich young lesbian who ruled the downtown Austin gay club scene was murdered by the handsome, drug-dealing boyfriend of her beautiful cheerleader girlfriend. I sent a letter to an editor I knew – who had turned down all my previous work – and mentioned the murder. Unknown to me, she sent my letter to her editor-in-chief, and six months later I had my first book deal – after years of trying and failing.

At that point, I’d never read a true crime book in my life. But I do think my friend was right. I had to write that book –

Wasted

. It and, more importantly, its murder victim Regina Hartwell have stayed in my soul for 16 years.

Regina always wanted to be famous, and I hope that in some way I’ve given her her 15 minutes of fame. Because of

Wasted

, Regina has been written about in gay publications from coast to coast and featured on two TV shows on the Investigation Discovery network – “Deadly Sins” and “Scorned.”

DW:  What was the most difficult aspect of writing about death?

Suzy Spencer:  Holding the grief and the agony of the family and friends of the murdered … and the grief and the agony of the family and friends of the murderer. People realize and understand that the family and friends of the murder victim are grief-stricken and their lives are irrevocably changed, but they don’t always understand is that the same thing happens to the family and friends of the killer.

For example, in my book

Wages of Sin

, which is about a young woman who was reared devout Southern Baptist, became a stripper, then a killer, her best friend was so devastated when she realized what her childhood friend had done that her life fell apart – a life that she’d worked hard to improve after coming from tragic circumstances. She couldn’t cope. She couldn’t work. She couldn’t study. She had to drop out of school. When I met her and interviewed her, she was still trying to understand and accept that her best friend was a killer and trying to get herself and her life back together, because she had a child she needed to protect and role model.

DW:  What surprised you most about writing true crime?

Suzy Spencer:  Oh, gosh, so much surprised me and still surprises me. I think when I started writing true crime I thought I’d just be a reporter telling a story. I had no comprehension that I would be holding people’s grief in my metaphorical hands, sitting with them and listening to their pain and anger, and trying to convey that in a book. I certainly didn’t realize how my work would make so many people angry – from judges to attorneys to parents and friends.

But from an everyday citizen point of view, I guess I wanted to believe everything in the world of true crime is black and white – someone murders someone, their guilt is black and white, the trial is black and white, the punishment is black and white.

I’ve learned that that’s not reality. When writing true crime, there are so many truths and rarely is one black and white. There is the family of the murder victim’s truth. There is the friends’ of the murder victim’s truth, which frequently is different from that of the family’s. There is the truth of the murderer’s family and friends. There is the prosecution’s truth, which may or may not be the whole truth. There is the defense’s truth, which rarely is the whole truth, but sometimes contains a lot of truths that the prosecution says are lies. There is the judge’s truth, which may be biased by personal prejudices and relationships. And there is the jury’s truth, which is determined by the hearing of incomplete “truths.”

As a reporter, I have to listen and respect each person’s truth, and then try to figure out what the facts are. And unfortunately, the facts aren’t black and white.

DW:  In your latest book,

Secret Sex Lives

, you mentioned the need to laugh. What aspect of writing these books took its toll on you?

Suzy Spencer:  Oh, gosh, there are so many things. The grief, the agony that I mentioned above. It’s hard to sit for hours with sources as they weep and not feel and share their pain. The responsibility – to the victims and their families and friends – to handle their stories with sensitivity and respect while telling the truth, which they may not know and maybe shouldn’t know. And then there are the physical, tangible aspects – holding in my hands murder victim Regina Hartwell’s blood, tissue, and retainer with her teeth still in it; holding and smelling her burned clothing; studying her detailed autopsy report and graphic autopsy photos; then staring at photos of her as a child and hearing the stories of her tragic young life. None of that ever leaves you. And I went through similar experiences for all four of my true crime books. After a while, that wears on one. Or at least it wore on me.

DW:  Do you think you'll ever go back to writing true crime?

Suzy Spencer:  I don’t plan on it.